Liability for Fall On Black Ice Colored By Human Intervention
Chester Dudzinski
Source: Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd., 901 A.2d 523 (Pa. Super. 2006)
Analysis
The trial court granted a nonsuit based upon the doctrine of “Hills and Ridges” based upon testimony that the plaintiff fell on black ice because there was no evidence of human interference in the creation of the black ice. The Superior Court reversed the holding because the evidence indicated that there was a snow storm followed by plowing followed by salting in disputed amounts. Dismissal by nonsuit was not proper.
What it Means For You

About C&W
You can also read more about the article's related practice groups:
General Litigation
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.c-wlaw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/55






