
Source: Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd., 901 A.2d 523 (Pa. Super. 2006)
The trial court granted a nonsuit based upon the doctrine of “Hills and Ridges” based upon testimony that the plaintiff fell on black ice because there was no evidence of human interference in the creation of the black ice. The Superior Court reversed the holding because the evidence indicated that there was a snow storm followed by plowing followed by salting in disputed amounts. Dismissal by nonsuit was not proper.

You can also read more about the article's related practice groups:
General Litigation
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.c-wlaw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/55