In denying a termination petition for credibility reasons, the judge ordered the employer to pay counsel fees for unreasonable contest. The Board reversed, ruling that the employer’s evidence would have allowed the judge to grant the termination petition if it had been credited. The claimant appealed to the Commonwealth Court, arguing that an Impairment Rating Evaluation (IRE) determination of 6% impairment precluded a subsequent termination, thus making the employer’s contest unreasonable as a matter of law. The Commonwealth Court rejected the claimant’s argument because there was no evidence that the claimant's knee injury in question was clearly irreversible.