- Home
-
Attorneys
75+ Attorneys in 7 Offices
Cipriani & Werner has over 75 attorneys in 7 cities with expertise in commercial litigation, civil litigation, workers’ compensation, and more.
Pittsburgh
Harrisburg
Philadelphia
Scranton
Marlton
Wheeling
Charleston
-
Practice Areas
Our Practice Areas
Cipriani & Werner has built expertise in commercial litigation, civil litigation, and workers’ compensation.
-
Offices
Our Offices
Cipriani & Werner has offices throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and West Virginia.
650 Washington Road Suite 700Pittsburgh, PA 15228Phone: (412) 563-25001011 Mumma Road Suite 201Lemoyne, PA 17043-1145Phone: (717) 975-9600450 Sentry Parkway Suite 200Blue Bell, PA 19422Phone: (610) 567-0700409 Lackawanna Ave Suite 402Scranton, PA 18503-2059Phone: (570) 347-0600155 Gaither Drive Suite BMt. Laurel, NJ 08054Phone: (856) 761-38001144 Market Street Suite 300Wheeling, WV 26003Phone: (304) 232-3600500 Virginia St. East Suite 750Charleston, WV 25301Phone: (304) 341-0500 -
C&W Journal
C&W Journal
Cipriani & Werner provides legal insight for business professionals.
May 2012 Edition
Commonwealth Court Chimes-In On Timely Revoking NTCP
Source
Galizia v. WCAB (Woodloch Pines, Inc.), 2007 WL 2752441; 601.1(a), 77 P.S. §717.1(a)
Analysis
In Galizia v. WCAB (Woodloch Pines, Inc.), the PA Commonwealth Court provided an important decision on the time limitations for a valid revocation of a Notice of Temporary Compensation Payable, LIBC-501 (or NTCP). The Claimant was injured on November 30, 2002 but continued working without a loss of earnings. The Claimant’s disability commenced January 6, 2003. On February 6, 2003, the Employer issued an NTCP and noted “medical documentation supports disability effective 1/31/03.” The Employer later issued a Notice Stopping Temporary Compensation and a Notice of Denial on April 28, 2003, which was within 90 days from February 6, 2007.
The Claimant filed Review, Reinstatement and Penalty Petitions alleging the Notice Stopping Temporary Compensation Payable and the Denial were untimely and therefore the NTCP had converted.
The Claimant argued that the 90-day period for proper revocation of the NTCP began on January 6, 2003, the date the Claimant retroactively received benefits. The Employer argued the 90-day period began to run on the date the NTCP was issued. The Employer prevailed before both the WCJ and Appeal Board.
The Commonwealth Court focused on §406.1(d)(6), which states:
(6) If the Employer does not file a notice under paragraph 5 within the 90-day period during which temporary compensation is paid or payable, the Employer shall be deemed to have admitted liability and the Notice of Temporary Compensation Payable shall be converted to a Notice of Compensation Payable.
The Commonwealth Court held that it was unambiguous and clear under §406.1(d)(6) that the first day of disability was the date that triggered the 90-day period for temporary compensation benefits pursuant to an NTCP. Accordingly, the Commonwealth Court overturned the WCJ and the Board and found that the NTCP had in fact converted and the Notice Stopping and Denial were untimely.
What it Means for You
It is important to set an accurate diary for revocation of the NTCP. The NTCP must be withdrawn within 90 days from the date disability commenced and the 90-day period is not triggered by the date of injury or the date that the NTCP was issued. Contact a Cipriani & Werner attorney to discuss any questions you may have on a NTCP issue in your particular case.
Journal Edition
November 2007
