A Bad "DIEHL" For Untimely IRE's
Cynthia Baker
Source: Diehl v. WCAB (IA Construction and Liberty Mutual Insurance), ___ A.2d. ___ (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007)
Analysis
In an unexpected and controversial decision, the Commonwealth Court has held that the filing of a Modification Petition, based upon evidence of an impairment rating of less than fifty percent is not the “traditional administrative process” contemplated by the Supreme Court in Gardner for modifying a claimant’s benefits based upon an untimely IRE. Instead, the Commonwealth Court held that an employer seeking to modify benefits to partial disability status must prove work availability either through a Labor Market Survey or through traditional job development as set forth by the Supreme Court in Kachinski.
What it Means For You

About C&W
You can also read more about the article's related practice groups:
Workers' Compensation
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.c-wlaw.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/155






