- Home
-
Attorneys
75+ Attorneys in 7 Offices
Cipriani & Werner has over 75 attorneys in 7 cities with expertise in commercial litigation, civil litigation, workers’ compensation, and more.
Pittsburgh
Harrisburg
Philadelphia
Scranton
Marlton
Wheeling
Charleston
-
Practice Areas
Our Practice Areas
Cipriani & Werner has built expertise in commercial litigation, civil litigation, and workers’ compensation.
-
Offices
Our Offices
Cipriani & Werner has offices throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and West Virginia.
650 Washington Road Suite 700Pittsburgh, PA 15228Phone: (412) 563-25001011 Mumma Road Suite 201Lemoyne, PA 17043-1145Phone: (717) 975-9600450 Sentry Parkway Suite 200Blue Bell, PA 19422Phone: (610) 567-0700409 Lackawanna Ave Suite 402Scranton, PA 18503-2059Phone: (570) 347-0600155 Gaither Drive Suite BMt. Laurel, NJ 08054Phone: (856) 761-38001144 Market Street Suite 300Wheeling, WV 26003Phone: (304) 232-3600500 Virginia St. East Suite 750Charleston, WV 25301Phone: (304) 341-0500 -
C&W Journal
C&W Journal
Cipriani & Werner provides legal insight for business professionals.
May 2012 Edition
Hamilton and Sbrolla successfully defend RICO Action
Post Date
01/27/12
C&W attorneys, Philip Sbrolla and Mark Hamilton, obtained the entry of summary judgment in a complex civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and civil rights dispute for a local municipality, elected officials and Township employees. The Plaintiffs, a sophisticated real estate developer and his companies sought to develop a strip mall adjacent to a major state road. The applications for the development were denied by the Township based upon Plaintiffs failure to abide by an official map and failure to mitigate the increased traffic associated with the development.
Plaintiffs filed a federal civil RICO and civil rights action alleging that the Township conspired with a national retail mall developer to require that they pay for infrastructure improvements that were not required for their proposed development. In granting summary judgment the District Court went so far as to state that the evidence advanced by the Plaintiffs was “woefully deficient” failing to support any of the elements of their alleged RICO claims. The District Court, in its 70 page opinion also dismissed Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 procedural due process, substantive due process and equal protection claims under the Fourteenth Amendment.
