- Home
-
Attorneys
75+ Attorneys in 7 Offices
Cipriani & Werner has over 75 attorneys in 7 cities with expertise in commercial litigation, civil litigation, workers’ compensation, and more.
Pittsburgh
Harrisburg
Philadelphia
Scranton
Marlton
Wheeling
Charleston
-
Practice Areas
Our Practice Areas
Cipriani & Werner has built expertise in commercial litigation, civil litigation, and workers’ compensation.
-
Offices
Our Offices
Cipriani & Werner has offices throughout Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and West Virginia.
650 Washington Road Suite 700Pittsburgh, PA 15228Phone: (412) 563-25001011 Mumma Road Suite 201Lemoyne, PA 17043-1145Phone: (717) 975-9600450 Sentry Parkway Suite 200Blue Bell, PA 19422Phone: (610) 567-0700409 Lackawanna Ave Suite 402Scranton, PA 18503-2059Phone: (570) 347-0600155 Gaither Drive Suite BMt. Laurel, NJ 08054Phone: (856) 761-38001144 Market Street Suite 300Wheeling, WV 26003Phone: (304) 232-3600500 Virginia St. East Suite 750Charleston, WV 25301Phone: (304) 341-0500 -
C&W Journal
C&W Journal
Cipriani & Werner provides legal insight for business professionals.
May 2012 Edition
Local Municipality Successfully Defended in Federal Civil Rights Case
Post Date
01/27/12
C&W attorneys, Gerard Cipriani and Philip Sbrolla, obtained the dismissal of a federal civil rights case against a local municipality and its elected council members.
The Plaintiff had served as the Borough’s K-9 officer for fifteen years. In 2010, Borough Council enacted a budget that eliminated the K-9 program due to the costs associated with the program, including overtime. The police officer brought suit against the Borough alleging violations of his First Amendment free speech rights and violation of his procedural and substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. He alleged that the elimination of the K-9 program was in retaliation for unspecified union activity. He also alleged that he was entitled to a hearing prior to the elimination of the program.
After allowing the Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint, the District Court granted the Defendants Motion to Dismiss finding that he had failed to state a claim.
